John Louis O’Sullivan writes to Thoreau:
I am very sorry that with so much in it that I like very much there are others in the paper you have favored me with which have decided me against its insertion. I trust, however, soon to hear from you again,—especially should I like some of those extracts from your Journal, reporting some of your private interviews with nature, with which I have before been so much pleased. That book of Etzler’s I had for some time had my mind upon to review. If you have got it, I should be very much obliged to you for a sight of it, and if you do not object I think i very likely that some addition & modification made with your concurrence would put your review of it into the shape to suit my peculiar notion on the subject. Articles of this nature are not generally published in D R on the responsibility of the individual name of the author, but under the general impersonality of the collective “we”—(the name of the author being usually indicated in pencil on the Index in the copies sent to the editors of newspapers). This system renders a certain pervading homogeneity necessary, inviting often the necessity of this process of editorial revision, or rather communication.
Very Respectfully Yours,
J. L. O’Sullivan
I am at present staying out of town. When I return to the City, if you are still in these latitudes, I shall hope to be afforded the pleasure of renewing the acquaintance begun under the auspices of our common friend Hawthorne.
“While Thoreau was living on Staten Island he made a constant round of the periodical publishers in an attempt to place his work. In general he was not successful. O’Sullivan however, printed a little sketch of Thoreau’s called “The Landlord” in the October 1843 number of the Demoncratic Review and the review of the Paradise within the Reach of All Men.”
Thoreau responds 1 August.