Commentary on Thoreaus Lectures
before Walden (6 August
1854)
Bradley P. Dean and Ronald Wesley Hoag
Reprinted from Thoreaus
Lectures Before Walden: An Annotated Calendar in
Studies in the American Renaissance 1995, ed. Joel
Myerson (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1995), pp. 129–230,
with the permission of Joel
Myerson.
View chronological list of lectures
Jump to lecture 1
Since Walter Harding presented his "Check List of Thoreaus Lectures" in
1948,001 he and many other scholars have discovered a great deal
more information about Thoreaus lecturing activities. For one thing, we now know
that Thoreau delivered at least seventy-five public lectures, nine more than those
recorded in 1948. No doubt a great deal more material awaits discovery, especially in the
newspapers of the time, in lyceum records, and in manuscript diaries and letters.
Nonetheless, enough new information is now available to warrant the publication of this
updated checklist, which brings together virtually all of the information currently known
about Thoreaus activities as a lecturer and which we present in two parts, with the
publication of Walden on 6 August 1854 forming the dividing line between the two
parts.
For the purposes of this checklist, a lecture is
Thoreaus (or, in one instance, a representatives) continuous and public
delivery of a text that Thoreau himself composed in advance of delivery. We do not regard
as lectures, then, Thoreaus unscheduled and apparently frequent private readings to
small groups of friends or family members. And we regard as two separate lectures
Thoreaus deliveries of what were apparently single lecture texts that he split for
particular occasions, reading half in the morning, for instance, and the other half later
in the day. A separate section after each of the two parts of the checklist, each for the
relevant period, notes private readings, impromptu speeches, possible but unconfirmed
lecture deliveries, and reported deliveries that have been proven spurious or are
otherwise problematic.
Analysis of the updated checklist confirms the
long-standing impression that Thoreaus career as a lecturer was less successful than
he had hoped, especially when measured by the number of lectures he delivered and the
financial reward he received for delivering them. Over the twenty-three years of his
seventy-five lecture career, he averaged just over three lectures per year, a paltry
figure for someone who aspired to be a professional lecturer in an age when many men made
a substantial income from lecturing. Even if we do not begin counting until 1843, which
was Thoreaus first multiple-lecture year and the commencement of his thereafter
continuous annual engagement as a lecturer, his lectures-per-year average rises to only a
bit more than four.
Before the publication of Walden,
Thoreaus lecturing career was promoted by Emerson, who, had he not thought to do so
on his own, was urged to that end by his wife, Lidian (see lecture 3 below). Also of pre-Walden
benefit was the celebrityand notorietyresulting from Horace Greeleys
endorsement in the New-York Tribune of Thoreaus contemplative pondside life
(see lecture 20 below). Somewhat surprisingly, the publication of Walden apparently
had only a marginal effect on the frequency of Thoreaus lecturing. Before Waldens
publication, Thoreau gave a total of forty-three lectures over seventeen years, averaging
2.5 a year, or a more noteworthy but still unimpressive 3.7 per year if we begin with his
two Concord lectures in 1843. After the publication of Walden, in the
six-and-a-half years through his last lecture in late 1860, Thoreau gave thirty-two
lectures or an average of 4.9 per year. In other words, assuming that he continually
sought lecturing assignments throughout these years, the record indicates that whatever
success Walden achieved translated into a relatively insignificant increase of
lecture engagements. This is a bit of a puzzle considering that in 1854, just after the
books publication, Thoreaus name appeared for the first time in the lists of
popular lecturers that the New-York Tribune printed every autumn, an inclusion
repeated every year thereafter till the end of his career.002
Thoreau himself had anticipated a considerable boost to his lecturing from Waldens
publication, for immediately after the book was in print he began preparing lectures for a
proposed tour the subsequent winter to the West and Canada. He was compelled to abandon
his plans, however, because of insufficient invitations.003
The lectures-per-year average is somewhat misleading
because it obscures some highly successful yearsand year-overlapping lecture seasons004that Thoreau enjoyed both before and after the publication
of Walden. His busiest calendar years as a lecturer were 1859 with ten lectures;
1852 with eight; 1849 and 1860 with seven each; and 1848, 1851, and 1854 with six each. In
terms of lecture seasons, his busiest were 1848-49 and 1851-52 with nine lectures each,
1854-55 and 1859-60 with seven each, and 1850-51 and 1856-57 with six each.
Thoreaus most frequently delivered lectures were
those in his "Walden; or, Life in the Woods" course. He delivered one or another
of the three lectures in this course a total of seventeen times. The first of the three,
"Economy," was his staple and, delivered on at least nine occasions, was one of
his two most frequently delivered lectures. The more philosophical second lecture of the
"Walden; or, Life in the Woods" course, a lecture Thoreau once described as
"Reality rather transcendentally treated" (C, p. 279), was presented five
times, while the third lecture had just three readingsat least in part, it would
seem, because his second lecture had the effect of failing to get him invited back to
deliver the third. Notably, he never repeated a lecture once it had reached published
form, and he made no exception for the lectures from his course on "Walden; or, Life
in the Woods."
Thoreaus other most frequently delivered
lecturelike "Economy," delivered nine timeswas "What Shall It
Profit," later called "Life Misspent" and eventually published as
"Life without Principle." His third most frequently delivered lecture was
"Walking," which he delivered eight times. Thoreau may well have regarded these
two lectures as lectures rather than nascent essays or chapters because they are
the only ones he delivered over a number of years and never moved toward publication, at
least not until he knew he was close to death. Perhaps he wanted to keep them in his
lecture portfolio because together they present his principal views on nature
("Walking") and humankind ("What Shall It Profit").
As a lecturer, Thoreau traveled a good deal in
Concord. Of his seventy-five known presentations, twenty-six of themmore than
one-thirdwere before his townspeople, and all but three of those as an unpaid guest
of the local lyceum. He gave his first Concord Lyceum lecture, on "Society," in
1838 at the Masonic Hall (see lecture 2 below), and thereafter moved with the Lyceum to
other venues,005 presenting his last lecture before the Lyceum,
"Wild Apples," in 1860 at Concords red-brick Centre School House, probably
in the high-school room. During the excitement over John Browns raid at
Harpers Ferry the previous year, Thoreau delivered two independent or non-lyceum
lectures in Concord, and on 20 September 1860 he delivered his other non-lyceum lecture in
Concord, "The Succession of Forest Trees," before a largely hometown audience at
the Middlesex Cattle Show. He was certainly not paid for either of his two John Brown
appearances, and there is no record of him having been paid for the appearance at the
Cattle Show.
Besides lecturing for the Concord Lyceum, Thoreau took
an intermittently active role in Lyceum affairs.006 He served as
secretary from 18 October 1838 until 15 December 1840. He was also elected curator on 7
November 1838. On 20 November 1840, he was elected but declined to serve as secretary and
curator. Elected curator again on 18 November 1842, he once more declined to serve,
although, as Hubert H. Hoeltje discovered, "the unpublished manuscript Cash Book
seems to indicate otherwise."007 Subsequently, on 5 March
1845, two curators resigned to protest an invitation to abolitionist Wendell Phillips to
lecture before the Lyceum. Thoreau, Emerson, and Samuel Barrett were chosen as
replacements. Finally, on 2 November 1853, Thoreau was elected curator but once more
declined. Curiously, Thoreaus cohorts in the Concord Lyceum often attributed his
lecture presentations to "David Henry Thoreau," or "D. H. Thoreau,"
rejecting, at least symbolically, his attempt to redefine himself. Indeed, while
Thoreaus average of more than one Concord Lyceum lecture a year over two decades
compares well enough with Emersons two per year over four decades, suggesting a good
reputation in his hometown, he complained in his journal about the perceived unwillingness
of his townspeople to recognize him as a professional lecturer (see lecture 42 below).
With regard to Thoreaus self-image and public
stature as a professional lecturer, there is a telling difference between him and Emerson,
a difference belied by the frequent appearances of both men before their home audiences.
Simply stated, with Concord removed from the equation, their lecturing careers are not at
all equivalent. Away from Concord, Emerson lectured far, wide, often, profitably, and to
international acclaim. Thoreau, away from Concord, delivered just fifty-two lectures in
almost twenty-three years, with only five beyond New England and none outside the United
States. Indeed, he lectured outside his home state on only nine occasions. Fifty of
Thoreaus seventy-four post-collegiate lectures were delivered in just five
Massachusetts communitiestwenty-six in Concord, nine in Worcester, six in Boston,
five in Plymouth, and four in neighboring Lincoln. Whereas Emerson made a good income
lecturing on "Wealth" and other topics, Thoreau was paid for only about forty of
his lecturesand on only one or two occasions for more than twenty-five dollars, but
usually just ten to twenty dollars including transportation from Concord. Prorated over
the length of his career, his income from lecturing was a pittance.008
With regard to numbers aloneof lectures given
and dollars earnedone may fairly say that Thoreaus career as a lecturer did
not amount to much. It would be a mistake and an injustice, however, to extend this same
conclusion to more than a merely quantitative appraisal. The final measure of these
lectures worth is the stature of the essays and books that they became, that were,
in a sense, their apotheosis. Thoreau himself described his method of composition as an
evolution from field observations to journal entries to lecture gleanings to fully
realized texts, an organic growth in which each phase advanced the maturation process (see
lecture 8 below). Viewed in this light, his lecture presentations were an integral part of
his authorship: an opportunity to vet ideas before audiences, a chance to hear himself
think out loud.
We need not, however, divert judgment from the spoken
texts to their published successors in order to construe Thoreau as a successful lecturer.
Nor do we have to over-rely on the inference, however logical, that he was a good enough
lecturer to have made twenty-three appearances before his Concord neighbors, who liked
what they heard well enough to come back for more, time and time again. To be sure, the
clearest indication that Thoreau was a successful lecturer is the responses to his
lectures by those who heard them delivered. Included in this checklist, these
responseswhether newspaper reports or anecdotal comments in letters and
diariessuggest that Thoreau, more often than not, was well received by a significant
portion of his audience and that many of his lectures drew enthusiastic responses from an
apparent majority. While Thoreaus platform performance could not match
Emersons (despite charges, particularly frequent before 1850, that he aped
Emersons manner), the expanded record does not support Henry S. Canbys charge
in 1939 that "He was a bad lecturernever successful except with
individuals."009 Indeed, although his lecturing style was
sometimes criticized, there is enough recorded praise to suggest that many found him an
engaging speaker. A survey of all known responses reveals, not surprisingly, that those
who found a measure of sense in Thoreaus often controversial ideas tended to enjoy
both the lecture and the lecturer, whereas those who rejected the ideas were likely
to dismiss the news and its bearer as foolish, offensive, or both.010
The compilers of this checklist will publish
"An
Annotated Checklist of Thoreaus Lectures after Walden" in the next
volume of Studies in the American Renaissance. We also plan to update the combined
checklist when sufficient new information warrants. Anyone discovering such information is
invited to submit findings to the checklist compilers for possible publication in either The
Thoreau Society Bulletin or The Concord Saunterer. This material will also be
included in any cumulative updates of the checklist.
View chronological list of lectures
Jump to lecture 1
Notes
1. Walter
Harding, "A Check
List of Thoreaus Lectures," Bulletin of the New York Public Library, 52
(February 1948): 78-87.
2. Horace Greeley, the editor of the New-York
Daily Tribune, printed the first of these annual lists on 27 September 1853, but
Thoreaus name is not mentioned until the following years list, printed in the Tribune
on 20 September 1854. The last time Thoreaus name appeared in the Tribunes
annual list was on 27 October 1860. Thoreau probably notified the Tribune the
following summer or fall that he was too ill to lecture during the 1861-62 lecture season.
3. On 21 September 1854, in a letter
to H. G. O. Blake, Thoreau pointed out that he planned to travel to the West to deliver
lectures sometime after delivering a lecture in Philadelphia on 21 November 1854 (The
Correspondence of Henry David Thoreau, ed. Walter
Harding and Carl Bode [New York: New
York University Press, 1958], p. 339; hereafter cited in the text and notes as C).
We have at least a partial record of his attempts to arrange lecture engagements for the
tour: in Hamilton, Canada West (Ontario), and in Akron, Ohio (C, pp. 347, 352-53).
Judging from these attempts, he appears to have planned the tour for late-December 1854
and January 1855.
4. The lecture season in
mid-nineteenth-century America began in the late autumn, usually late November, and ended
at the beginning of spring, usually mid April.
5. Identifying the venue for each of
the lectures Thoreau delivered before the Concord Lyceum is problematic because the Lyceum
secretaries, who over the years were responsible for maintaining the Lyceum records,
rarely identified where a particular lecture was delivered. However, the secretaries
almost always identified the venue for the Lyceums first meeting of a given season,
and we know the venue for quite a few lectures from a variety of other sources, such as
letters and diary entries. Because of the high degree of correlation between the known
venues for lectures and the recorded venues for the first meetings of the seasons, we have
assumed, unless we had evidence to the contrary, that Thoreau delivered his Concord Lyceum
lectures at the same venues where the first meetings of the seasons were held.
6. Hubert H. Holtje summarizes
Thoreaus administrative positions in the Concord Lyceum in "Thoreau as
Lecturer," New England Quarterly, 19 (December 1946): 490n9.
7. Hoeltje, "Thoreau as
Lecturer," 490n9.
8. Based on all the evidence we have
been able to gather, we speculate that Thoreau earned approximately $700 from lecturing
during his twenty-three-year career, an average of about $27 annually.
9. Henry S. Canby,
Thoreau
(Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1939), p. 135.
10. Hoeltje makes substantively this
same point in "Thoreau as Lecturer," 489, 494.
View chronological list of lectures
Jump to lecture 1
|